skip page navigationOregon State University
College of Forestry:     Forest Engineering | Forest Resources | Forest Science | Wood Science and Engineering
Department of Forest Engineering
template image
Marv Pyles

 

 

Marvin R. Pyles


Associate Professor
Registered Professional Civil Engineer:
California and Oregon
BS, 1973 Oregon State University
MS, 1975 Oregon State University
PhD, 1981 University of California, Berkeley
Email:

 

Research Interests

engineering properties of soils, slope stability, hydraulics and hydrology, logging mechanics, forest roads

Current Research

Marv Pyles continues to conduct a broad array of research, extending from applications of classical hydraulics and hydrology, through theoretical and experimental studies of soil shear strength and root reinforcement, to cable logging mechanics. In Marv's words, "I'm a problem solver, so, much of the research that I do is directly related to an applied problem currently at the forefront in Forest Engineering practice". Applied science shows up clearly in Marv's work with fish passage at road stream crossings. "The biggest bang for our buck in helping threatened and endangered fish species is to provide access to the habitat that currently exists. Design and construction of stream crossing culverts to provide for free movement of fish throughout their natural range will be costly, but it is still the most effective use of monies intended to restore fish species". Theoretical work can be seen in Marv's studies of soil shear strength and the effect that roots have on soil strength. "The root reinforcement story and its' link to landslides on steep forest land - which is very compelling to the layman - is just full of holes that are begging to be filled with high quality research. There is little doubt in my mind that roots provide reinforcement of forest soil that translates into a greater resistance to landsliding than in non-rooted soils, however, current simple models of root reinforcement are simply not adequate to explain when and where, and under what circumstances roots make the difference between a stable slope and a landslide. There is a big difference between showing that roots can influence slope stability, and showing the real magnitude of that influence." Logging mechanics has always been an enjoyable application of structural mechanics for Marv. "I have had a lot of fun over the years adapting classical structural mechanics analysis techniques from Civil Engineering to cable logging problems." Do we know all that we need to know about logging mechanics? "It is clear that good loggers know how to get the job done, but that doesn't mean that there are not opportunities to improve practices and most importantly, improve safety." Logging mechanics serves as a foundation for new ideas, and for examining the safety implications of proposed practices.

Current Programs

fish passage at low volume road crossings, analytical modeling of tail spars and intermediated supports, failure mechanisms in shallow forest soils, peak flow hydrology

Courses

  • FE 315: Soil Engineering
  • FE 316: Soil Mechanics
  • FE 330: Fluid Mechanics and Hydraulics

Educational Philosophy

I believe that Engineering Education should be an appropriate balance of basic fundamentals that will serve an engineer throughout a professional career and current topics that have a short half-life, and yet are essential to current practice. In general, the Engineering Sciences, which include the courses that I teach, are lasting fundamentals that will have application to engineering problems many years into the future. The Engineering Sciences should dominate any engineering program. The engineering problems that a professional encounters change over time, but the solutions are always based on fundamental theories and principles. Adapting fundamental theories to solve new problems is the essence of engineering. For this reason, I expect students to understand engineering fundamentals. Getting the correct answer to a problem is not the test of success in the classroom. Rather, success is understanding the problems well enough to seek out an appropriate solution method. Along the way, the correct answer will be forthcoming. The key to success in my courses is understanding. You should be satisfied with nothing less. One of the best tests of understanding is to explain what you know and how it applies to engineering problems. For this reason, complete work in my courses includes thorough written documentation that explains your approach to a problem and the method of solution. Calculations without written narrative documentation are not acceptable in professional practice, therefore, they are not acceptable in school.

Selected Publications

Pyles, M. R. and C.K. Lyons. 2001. Analysis of Unguyed Spar-Trees. International Journal of Forest Engineering. 12(2).

Beschta, R. L., M.R. Pyles, A.E. Skaugset, and C.G. Surfleet. 2000. Peakflow responses to forest practices in the western cascades of Oregon, USA. Journal of Hydrology, 233(2000): 102-120.

Pyles, M.R., P.W. Adams, R.L. Beschta, and AE Skaugset. 1998. Forest practices and landslides. A report prepared for Governor John Kitzhaber. Forest Engineering Department, OSU, Corvallis.

Pyles, M.R., and AE Skaugset. 1998. Landslides and forest practice regulation in Oregon In: Environmental, Groundwater, and Engineering Geology: Applications from Oregon, Scott Burns (ed.), Star Publishing Co., Belmont, CA. pp. 481-488.

Bakke, P.D., and M.R. Pyles. 1997. Predictive model for nitrate load in the Bull Run Watershed Oregon. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 33(4):897-906.

Nodes, J.E., M.R. Pyles, and F.R. Butruille. 1997. Repeated-load test performance of a forest road subgrade soil at field stree levels. Proceedings, International Symposium on Thin Pavements, Surface Treatments, Unbound Roads, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, New Brunswick, Canada, June 24-25, pp. 109-116.

Pyles, M.R., K.C. Womack and H.I. Laursen. 1994. Dynamic characteristics of a small skyline logging system with a guyed tailspar. Journal of Forest Engineering, 6(1):35-49.

Charland, J., A.G. Hernried and M.R. Pyles. 1994. Cable Systems with elastic supporting elements. Journal of Structural Engineering. ASCE, 120(12):3649-3665.

Pyles, M.R., J.W. Anderson and S.G. Stafford. 1991. Capacity of second-growth Douglas-fir and Western Hemlock stump anchors for cable logging. Journal of Forest Engineering. 3(1):20-37.

Schoenemann, M.R. And M.R. Pyles. 1990. Statistical description of triaxial shear test results. Geotechnical Testing Journal, GTJODJ, 13(1):58-62.

Selected Recent Theses

Lyons, C. Kevin. 2001. Mechanical Stresses in Trees Resulting from Strain Compatibility in an Anisotropic Material. PhD.

House, Matthew R. 2001. Countersunk Culvert Hydraulics for Upstream Juvenile Fish Passage. MS.

Bransom, Mark. 1997. Geohydrologic conditions on a steep forested slope: modeling transient piezometric response to precipitation. PhD

Skaugset, Arne. 1997. Modeling root reinforcement in shallow forest soils. PhD

 

template image