RE: [IAWA Forum] Fluid density altered by evaporation at the leaf?


From: "Andrew K Fletcher" <Gravity@blueyonder.co.uk>
Subject: RE: [IAWA Forum] Fluid density altered by evaporation at the leaf?
Date: Wed, 5 Apr 2006 09:35:16 +0100

Next Article (by Subject): [IAWA Forum] Ưndented Rings "Barbaros Yaman"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [IAWA Forum] Fluid density altered by evaporation at the leaf? "Andrew K Fletcher"
Top of Thread: [IAWA Forum] Fluid density altered by evaporation at the leaf? "Andrew K Fletcher"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C65894.3F223B90
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Paul

The salt exuding plants like Mangrove are firm evidence for the location =
of concentrated fluids in the leaves and upper branches of the tree. =
Maybe the exuding salt plants have to be more efficient at transporting =
higher volumes of salts due to environmental factors. So the density of =
the xylem sap should be significantly higher in mangrove than a tree =
with significantly higher concentrations of water molecules in the soil =
water.

It should as you say be possible to calculate a dynamic salt budget. =
This could be tested by increasing the density of the soil water to the =
point that the tree wilts, and the reverse should also be possible by =
increasing the water molecules of the soil water to the point where the =
wilting stops and the tree restores the lost fluids.

A 3% increase in both salt / or / and sugar density at the leaves is =
very significant. The molecular weight of said salts and sugars at the =
top of the tree will inevitably cause an imbalance with sap in close =
proximity and initiate the movement of the denser sap.

I agree with you that it does not matter about the exact fraction of =
water that is lost through transpiration, more water loss =3D more water =
pulled in to replace the lost water and higher volumes of dilute sap =
flowing through the leaves.

Andrew



I was wondering if maybe from the nutrient standpoint, it doesn't matter =
so much the exact fraction of water that is passing straight through =
(the 99%) as long as it is nearly all, but that none of the salts leave =
through transpiration (except from those salt plants that exude salts). =
So one could in principal calculate a sort of dynamic salt budget =
incorporating input rate through the roots, the plant growth (expanding =
symplasm volume), and salt loss through shedding of plant parts.

I believe the density of water only increases by about 3% (at 25 deg-C) =
going from pure to 1 molal NaCl. The inside of leaf parenchyma cells =
must see those kind of solute concentrations, but I believe the xylem =
sap is thought of as much more dilute. Seems like the living cells must =
be stripping the xylem of its solutes before the transpiration stream =
reaches the stomata or we'd see crusts around stomata or substomatal =
cavities. Then there's those salt plants...

Paul Schulte


Simcha, Thank you for elaborating.
I agree with you on the phloem being a route to a sink and for =
identifying
the drop off sites for the many types of molecules found in the sap.
Do you agree that the massive loss of water vapour in the transpiring =
tree=20
must have an effect on the sap it evaporates from?
Andrew

I think that the phloem must be a strong sink, directly or via various =
types of
living cells.  There are many types of molecules involved with various =
types of
sinks and specific transporters.  Some are moved by the phloem to sinks =
such as
cambial activity or developing fruit and leaves.  Others turn into =
polymers
that may later turn into monomers (e.g., starch) but others may be =
"buried" in
lignin which is an end product.  Silicon can turn into opal and be =
deposited in
special cells or cover the epidermis.  There are many roads to Rome.  I =
don't
think that a single, simple solution can explain this complicated =
phenomenon.
Simcha

------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C65894.3F223B90
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2802" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>
<P><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3>Paul</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3>The salt exuding plants like =
Mangrove are=20
firm evidence for the location of concentrated fluids in the leaves and =
upper=20
branches of the tree. Maybe the exuding salt plants have to be more =
efficient at=20
transporting higher volumes of salts due to environmental factors. So =
the=20
density of the xylem sap should be significantly higher in mangrove than =
a tree=20
with significantly higher concentrations of water molecules in the soil=20
water.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3>It should as you say be =
possible to=20
calculate a dynamic salt budget. This could be tested by increasing the =
density=20
of the soil water to the point that the tree wilts, and the reverse =
should also=20
be possible by increasing the water molecules of the soil water to the =
point=20
where the wilting stops and the tree restores the lost =
fluids.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3>A 3% increase in both salt / =
or / and=20
sugar density at the leaves is very significant. The molecular weight of =
said=20
salts and sugars at the top of the tree will inevitably cause an =
imbalance with=20
sap in close proximity and initiate the movement of the denser =
sap.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3>I agree with you that it does =
not matter=20
about the exact fraction of water that is lost through transpiration, =
more water=20
loss =3D more water pulled in to replace the lost water and higher =
volumes of=20
dilute sap flowing through the leaves.</FONT></P>
<P><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3>Andrew</FONT></P>
<P><BR><BR><FONT face=3D"Times New Roman" size=3D3>I was wondering if =
maybe from the=20
nutrient standpoint, it doesn't matter so much the exact fraction of =
water that=20
is passing straight through (the 99%) as long as it is nearly all, but =
that none=20
of the salts leave through transpiration (except from those salt plants =
that=20
exude salts). So one could in principal calculate a sort of dynamic salt =
budget=20
incorporating input rate through the roots, the plant growth (expanding =
symplasm=20
volume), and salt loss through shedding of plant parts.<BR><BR>I believe =
the=20
density of water only increases by about 3% (at 25 deg-C) going from =
pure to 1=20
molal NaCl. The inside of leaf parenchyma cells must see those kind of =
solute=20
concentrations, but I believe the xylem sap is thought of as much more =
dilute.=20
Seems like the living cells must be stripping the xylem of its solutes =
before=20
the transpiration stream reaches the stomata or we'd see crusts around =
stomata=20
or substomatal cavities. Then there's those salt plants...<BR><BR>Paul=20
Schulte</FONT></P><SPAN=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 12pt; FONT-FAMILY: 'Times New Roman'; =
mso-fareast-font-family: 'Times New Roman'; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; =
mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA">
<DIV><BR><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Simcha, </FONT>Thank you for =
elaborating.<BR>I=20
agree with you on the phloem being a route to a sink and for =
identifying<BR>the=20
drop off sites for the many types of molecules found in the sap.<BR>Do =
you agree=20
that the massive loss of water vapour in the transpiring tree <BR>must =
have an=20
effect on the sap it evaporates from?</DIV>
<DIV>Andrew</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>
<P class=3DMsoNormal style=3D"MARGIN: 0cm 0cm 0pt">I think that the =
phloem must be a=20
strong sink, directly or via various types of<BR>living cells.&nbsp; =
There are=20
many types of molecules involved with various types of<BR>sinks and =
specific=20
transporters.&nbsp; Some are moved by the phloem to sinks such =
as<BR>cambial=20
activity or developing fruit and leaves.&nbsp; Others turn into =
polymers<BR>that=20
may later turn into monomers (e.g., starch) but others may be "buried"=20
in<BR>lignin which is an end product.&nbsp; Silicon can turn into opal =
and be=20
deposited in<BR>special cells or cover the epidermis.&nbsp; There are =
many roads=20
to Rome.&nbsp; I don=92t<BR>think that a single, simple solution can =
explain this=20
complicated phenomenon.<BR>Simcha<SPAN lang=3DEN-US=20
style=3D"FONT-SIZE: 10pt; COLOR: navy; FONT-FAMILY: Arial; =
mso-ansi-language: EN-US"><?xml:namespace=20
prefix =3D o ns =3D "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office"=20
/><o:p></o:p></SPAN></P></SPAN></FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_007C_01C65894.3F223B90--

======== Welcome All Anatomists! ==========
About this IAWA Discussion Group, subscribing, unsubscribing, and archives:
http://www.cof.orst.edu/org/IAWA
About the IAWA and/or the IAWA Journal:
http://www.kuleuven.ac.be/bio/sys/iawa
The International Association of Wood Anatomists



Next Article (by Subject): [IAWA Forum] Ưndented Rings "Barbaros Yaman"
Previous Article (by Subject): RE: [IAWA Forum] Fluid density altered by evaporation at the leaf? "Andrew K Fletcher"
Top of Thread: [IAWA Forum] Fluid density altered by evaporation at the leaf? "Andrew K Fletcher"
Articles sorted by: [Date] [Author] [Subject]


Go to OSU College of Forestry LWGate Home Page.