From: "John Barnett" <j.r.barnett@reading.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: [IAWA Forum] RE: Radial water transport
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2002 17:28:11 +0100
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [IAWA Forum] Re: Radial water transport "Richard Jagels"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [IAWA Forum] Re: Radial water transport Guillermo Angeles Alvarez
Top of Thread: Re: [IAWA Forum] RE: Radial water transport "P. Baas"
Next in Thread: Re: [IAWA Forum] RE: Radial water transport Rod Savidge
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C26E26.E8BA20C0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I think that Lloyd is right that there will be some radial shift of = water as a result of pit distribution in tangential walls of conifers. = This will be helped by the fact that tracheids often have tips which are = displaced out of line with the rest of the cell, and most pits tend to = be towards the tips. It also seems to me that where you have ray = tracheids then these would allow radial transport. The situation with = parenchyma is less clear. I once, for fun, did a dye flow experiment with oak. I cut through the = base of an oak sapling (in leaf) about 1.5 metres high and about 2cm = diameter at the base and immersed the base of the cut stem in a jar of = safranin. The day was hot and dry and followed a spell of hot dry = weather, so one could imagine the plant was drought stressed. In the = time it took me to walk back to the lab carrying the plant in the liquid = (about five minutes), about 50ml of safranin had been drawn up. I = refilled the pot of safranin and left the assembly for about fifteen = minutes. I then started cutting back from the tips. Safranin had already = reached the smallest twigs. I then cut back into the main stem, which = was stained red everywhere except in the large multiseriate rays. This = suggested to me that these rays play no part in water transport. The = uniseriate rays did seem to stain. Of course, the question of radial = transport did not arise as the whole base of the stem was immersed. I am = unable to explain this observation. I was unable to repeat the = experiment since the following day the "gardeners" at the University = brashed out all the wild oak saplings which were apparently getting in = their way! John Professor J.R.Barnett School of Plant Sciences The University of Reading Whiteknights Reading RG6 6AS UK Tel. 01183 786162 Fax. 01189 753676 ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C26E26.E8BA20C0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2600.0" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I think that Lloyd is right that there = will be some=20 radial shift of water as a result of pit distribution in tangential = walls of=20 conifers. This will be helped by the fact that tracheids often have tips = which=20 are displaced out of line with the rest of the cell, and most pits tend = to be=20 towards the tips. It also seems to me that where you have ray tracheids = then=20 these would allow radial transport. The situation with parenchyma is = less=20 clear.</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>I once, for fun, did a dye flow = experiment with=20 oak. I cut through the base of an oak sapling (in leaf) about 1.5 = metres=20 high and about 2cm diameter at the base and immersed the base of the cut = stem in=20 a jar of safranin. The day was hot and dry and followed a spell of hot = dry=20 weather, so one could imagine the plant was drought stressed. In = the time=20 it took me to walk back to the lab carrying the plant in the liquid = (about=20 five minutes), about 50ml of safranin had been drawn up. I refilled = the pot=20 of safranin and left the assembly for about fifteen minutes. I then = started=20 cutting back from the tips. Safranin had already reached the smallest = twigs. I=20 then cut back into the main stem, which was stained red everywhere=20 <STRONG>except</STRONG> in the large multiseriate rays. This suggested = to me=20 that these rays play no part in water transport. The uniseriate = rays did=20 seem to stain. Of course, the question of radial transport did not arise = as the=20 whole base of the stem was immersed. I am unable to explain this = observation. I=20 was unable to repeat the experiment since the following day the = "gardeners" at=20 the University brashed out all the wild oak saplings which were = apparently=20 getting in their way!</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>John</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Professor J.R.Barnett<BR>School of = Plant=20 Sciences<BR>The University of Reading<BR>Whiteknights<BR>Reading<BR>RG6=20 6AS<BR>UK</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Tel. 01183 786162<BR>Fax. 01189=20 753676</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0035_01C26E26.E8BA20C0--
Next Article (by Subject): Re: [IAWA Forum] Re: Radial water transport "Richard Jagels"
Previous Article (by Subject): Re: [IAWA Forum] Re: Radial water transport Guillermo Angeles Alvarez
Top of Thread: Re: [IAWA Forum] RE: Radial water transport "P. Baas"
Next in Thread: Re: [IAWA Forum] RE: Radial water transport Rod Savidge
Articles sorted by: [Date]
[Author]
[Subject]